🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of the publication Authentic, speaker Burey raises a critical point: commonplace injunctions to “bring your true self” or “show up completely genuine at work” are not benevolent calls for individuality – they often become snares. This initial publication – a mix of personal stories, investigation, cultural commentary and conversations – aims to reveal how organizations co-opt identity, moving the burden of institutional change on to staff members who are frequently at risk.

Professional Experience and Broader Context

The impetus for the work stems partly in Burey’s own career trajectory: multiple jobs across corporate retail, new companies and in international development, interpreted via her perspective as a disabled Black female. The dual posture that the author encounters – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and looking for safety – is the core of the book.

It emerges at a moment of general weariness with institutional platitudes across America and other regions, as backlash to diversity and inclusion efforts mount, and many organizations are cutting back the very systems that once promised change and reform. Burey delves into that terrain to contend that retreating from authenticity rhetoric – namely, the corporate language that reduces individuality as a collection of appearances, idiosyncrasies and interests, leaving workers concerned with handling how they are seen rather than how they are treated – is not the answer; we must instead reframe it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Performance of Persona

Via colorful examples and discussions, Burey illustrates how underrepresented staff – individuals of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, women workers, employees with disabilities – soon understand to adjust which self will “pass”. A sensitive point becomes a disadvantage and people compensate excessively by striving to seem acceptable. The practice of “showing your complete identity” becomes a reflective surface on which all manner of anticipations are cast: emotional labor, sharing personal information and continuous act of gratitude. According to Burey, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but absent the protections or the trust to endure what arises.

According to the author, employees are requested to expose ourselves – but absent the protections or the reliance to endure what emerges.’

Real-Life Example: An Employee’s Journey

She illustrates this phenomenon through the account of a worker, a employee with hearing loss who took it upon himself to teach his co-workers about the culture of the deaf community and communication practices. His eagerness to talk about his life – a behavior of candor the workplace often commends as “authenticity” – briefly made daily interactions smoother. However, Burey points out, that advancement was precarious. After employee changes wiped out the unofficial understanding the employee had developed, the atmosphere of inclusion disappeared. “Everything he taught went away with the staff,” he notes wearily. What was left was the exhaustion of having to start over, of being held accountable for an institution’s learning curve. From the author’s perspective, this illustrates to be asked to reveal oneself without protection: to face exposure in a system that praises your honesty but fails to codify it into procedure. Authenticity becomes a pitfall when institutions rely on employee revelation rather than structural accountability.

Writing Style and Notion of Opposition

The author’s prose is at once lucid and expressive. She blends intellectual rigor with a style of solidarity: a call for readers to engage, to challenge, to dissent. According to the author, dissent at work is not loud rebellion but moral resistance – the act of opposing uniformity in environments that expect appreciation for basic acceptance. To resist, from her perspective, is to interrogate the accounts companies narrate about justice and belonging, and to reject participation in rituals that sustain inequity. It might look like calling out discrimination in a gathering, choosing not to participate of voluntary “inclusion” labor, or establishing limits around how much of one’s personal life is provided to the organization. Opposition, Burey indicates, is an declaration of personal dignity in settings that often praise conformity. It represents a habit of principle rather than opposition, a way of insisting that a person’s dignity is not conditional on institutional approval.

Reclaiming Authenticity

The author also avoids inflexible opposites. Her work avoids just toss out “sincerity” entirely: on the contrary, she advocates for its reclamation. In Burey’s view, genuineness is not the raw display of personality that corporate culture frequently praises, but a more deliberate alignment between individual principles and one’s actions – an integrity that rejects distortion by institutional demands. Rather than considering genuineness as a mandate to overshare or conform to cleansed standards of candor, Burey urges readers to keep the aspects of it based on truth-telling, personal insight and principled vision. In her view, the aim is not to give up on sincerity but to relocate it – to remove it from the executive theatrical customs and toward relationships and offices where confidence, fairness and answerability make {